Question No 54:
Your network contains an Active Directory domain named contoso.com. All domain controllers run
Windows Server 2012 R2. An organizational unit (OU) named OU1 contains 200 client computers that run Windows 8 Enterprise. A Group Policy object (GPO) named GPO1 is linked to OU1.
You make a change to GPO1. You need to force all of the computers in OU1 to refresh their Group Policy settings immediately. The solution must minimize administrative effort. Which tool should you use?
A. The Secedit command
B. Group Policy Management Console (GPMC)
C. Server Manager
D. The Gpupdate command
Answer: B
Friday, 20 May 2016
Friday, 13 May 2016
70-411 Exam Question No 53
Question No 53:
Your network contains two servers named Server1 and Server2. Both servers run Windows Server 2012 R2 and have the DNS Server server role installed. Server1 hosts a primary zone for contoso.com. Server2 hosts a secondary zone for contoso.com. The zone is not configured to notify secondary servers of changes automatically. You update several records on Server1. You need to force the replication of the contoso.com zone records from Server1 to Server2. What should you do from Server2?
A. Right-click the contoso.com zone and click Reload.
B. Right-click the contoso.com zone and click Transfer from Master.
C. Right-click Server2 and click Update Server Data Files.
D. Right-click Server2 and click Refresh.
Answer: B
Your network contains two servers named Server1 and Server2. Both servers run Windows Server 2012 R2 and have the DNS Server server role installed. Server1 hosts a primary zone for contoso.com. Server2 hosts a secondary zone for contoso.com. The zone is not configured to notify secondary servers of changes automatically. You update several records on Server1. You need to force the replication of the contoso.com zone records from Server1 to Server2. What should you do from Server2?
A. Right-click the contoso.com zone and click Reload.
B. Right-click the contoso.com zone and click Transfer from Master.
C. Right-click Server2 and click Update Server Data Files.
D. Right-click Server2 and click Refresh.
Answer: B
Friday, 6 May 2016
70-411 Exam Question No 52
Question No 52:
Your network contains two servers named Served and Server 2. Both servers run Windows Server 2012 R2 and have the DNS Server server role installed. On Server1, you create a standard primary zone named contoso.com. You plan to create a standard primary zone for ad.contoso.com on Server2. You need to ensure that Server1 forwards all queries for ad.contoso.com to Server2.
What should you do from Server1?
A. Create a trust anchor named Server2.
B. Create a conditional forward that points to Server2.
C. Add Server2 as a name server.
D. Create a zone delegation that points to Server2.
Answer: D
Your network contains two servers named Served and Server 2. Both servers run Windows Server 2012 R2 and have the DNS Server server role installed. On Server1, you create a standard primary zone named contoso.com. You plan to create a standard primary zone for ad.contoso.com on Server2. You need to ensure that Server1 forwards all queries for ad.contoso.com to Server2.
What should you do from Server1?
A. Create a trust anchor named Server2.
B. Create a conditional forward that points to Server2.
C. Add Server2 as a name server.
D. Create a zone delegation that points to Server2.
Answer: D
Sunday, 1 May 2016
Google and Microsoft have Made a Pact to Protect Surveillance Capitalism
Microsoft and Google, two of the largest monopolies in the world, have been rivals for almost 20 years. But suddenly, in late April, it announced a surprising agreement. Companies have removed all regulatory complaints against each other globally. Instead of fighting their battles in public courts and commissions, which have agreed to negotiate in private.
This is a gentleman's agreement. The details are secret, but the message from both sides is that the agreement reflects a change in management philosophy. new head of Microsoft Satya Nadella is willing to promote the vision of a dynamic collaboration of Microsoft in collaboration with everyone from Apple to Salesforce.
The most spectacular of these partners is Google, a company that has been considered a great archrival Microsoft.
The wind began to change in September, just after Sundar Pichai became CEO of Google, when the two companies agreed to stop fighting by patents - a first step towards the current agreement. Joint business line is that companies want to compete in products not in court cases.
But this tactic PR mask two much more interesting stories. One is about Microsoft and its desperate search for relevance. The other is in Google, money and power. Both are part of a larger story, very disturbing - a story about how technology companies are busy redrawing the lines around our lives, facing little resistance.
It could be seen as a pragmatic movement. Microsoft benefits exceed even Google, but the report has been in decline for a decade. Meanwhile, since 2012, Apple has surpassed the two combined companies (although recent figures suggest that this momentum could be slower). A number of regulatory investigations into alleged violations of monopoly Google will continue even in the absence of Microsoft - both areas in which Microsoft has filed complaints (Europe, Brazil, Argentina) and the other where he did not like India.
With the withdrawal of Microsoft, it is clear that the other applicants in the fighting - usually small niche Internet business - are legitimate criticism in his own right. But again, we need coordination and resources to sustain serious and succeed in combat competition. Winning, in particular, a large and impressive overall, is a much bigger without a supporter with much money as Microsoft order.
Explaining this concept Hannover Messe 2016 NADELLA intelligence systems such as feedback loops enabled digital set cloud. They are based on the data stream of people, places and things connected to a network of activities. And they promise unprecedented power to reason, predict and understand.
This is the unbridled utopia large volumes of data. And it is a vision that brings Microsoft Google squarely in the territory. So maybe Microsoft withdraws regulatory battles, because it will not shoot in the foot. For professor emeritus at Harvard Business School Shoshana Zuboff, it becomes the core of the Google-Microsoft agreement.
Zuboff is a leading spokesman for what he calls "the surveillance capitalism" monetizing data on the behavior free from monitoring and sold to entities that have an interest in their future behavior. As explained in the Guardian monitoring capitalism, "Google has discovered. Microsoft came late to this game, but now got into the water. Viewed this way, your agreement with Google is predictable and rational."
And here it is the sinister result of Microsoft's decision to stop needling Google with litigation becomes evident. "A key topic I am writing about capitalism is that monitoring flourished in the lawless area," says Zuboff. "Regulations and laws are their enemies. The democratic control is a threat. Anarchy is so vital to capitalism project tracking" he continues, "that the shared interest of Google and Microsoft on freedom of regulation are greater the narrow competing interests that they have or once thought they had. they can not insist that the public should be regulated by trying to impose regulations on the other. "
"The only thing any regime antitrust absolutely must do if we want to be effective, it is to withstand the most powerful companies of the time," says Grunes. "The competition for disposal and is significant."
"The competition authorities in the US and the EU, in the case of Microsoft. 'Brains were taken, resources and continuous and tireless commitment."
However, only Europeans, he argues, seem to have the intellectual leadership to do so in the case of Google. "The failure of the FTC to take action against Google is certainly one of the great failures of all time."
Microsoft and Google new agreement to stop fighting against each other is an interesting move strategic company. But there is a movement accompanied a deeper much stronger game: to collect and take advantage of data - including data about us, our behaviors and interactions. The challenge for regulators and citizens is complex but essential - and has just started.
This is a gentleman's agreement. The details are secret, but the message from both sides is that the agreement reflects a change in management philosophy. new head of Microsoft Satya Nadella is willing to promote the vision of a dynamic collaboration of Microsoft in collaboration with everyone from Apple to Salesforce.
The most spectacular of these partners is Google, a company that has been considered a great archrival Microsoft.
The wind began to change in September, just after Sundar Pichai became CEO of Google, when the two companies agreed to stop fighting by patents - a first step towards the current agreement. Joint business line is that companies want to compete in products not in court cases.
But this tactic PR mask two much more interesting stories. One is about Microsoft and its desperate search for relevance. The other is in Google, money and power. Both are part of a larger story, very disturbing - a story about how technology companies are busy redrawing the lines around our lives, facing little resistance.
Waste and Fury
No one wants to start a legal battle. Grump, painful and costly, they are diverting enormous resources, often low productive gain. But that in itself does not explain Microsoft's decision to abandon the pending claims regulation against Google in Europe, Brazil and Argentina, as well as cease funding and participation in pressure groups supported for eight years as FairSearch.org and ICOMP, the Initiative for competitive online market. So what do I explain it?It could be seen as a pragmatic movement. Microsoft benefits exceed even Google, but the report has been in decline for a decade. Meanwhile, since 2012, Apple has surpassed the two combined companies (although recent figures suggest that this momentum could be slower). A number of regulatory investigations into alleged violations of monopoly Google will continue even in the absence of Microsoft - both areas in which Microsoft has filed complaints (Europe, Brazil, Argentina) and the other where he did not like India.
With the withdrawal of Microsoft, it is clear that the other applicants in the fighting - usually small niche Internet business - are legitimate criticism in his own right. But again, we need coordination and resources to sustain serious and succeed in combat competition. Winning, in particular, a large and impressive overall, is a much bigger without a supporter with much money as Microsoft order.
New Microsoft
But there is another possible, a little more crafty, pattern. Microsoft is now facing a very different ecosystem of the company that dominated in the 1990s have to adapt. And it seems to want to do to position themselves in the center of what Satya Nadella described as "intelligent systems".Explaining this concept Hannover Messe 2016 NADELLA intelligence systems such as feedback loops enabled digital set cloud. They are based on the data stream of people, places and things connected to a network of activities. And they promise unprecedented power to reason, predict and understand.
This is the unbridled utopia large volumes of data. And it is a vision that brings Microsoft Google squarely in the territory. So maybe Microsoft withdraws regulatory battles, because it will not shoot in the foot. For professor emeritus at Harvard Business School Shoshana Zuboff, it becomes the core of the Google-Microsoft agreement.
Zuboff is a leading spokesman for what he calls "the surveillance capitalism" monetizing data on the behavior free from monitoring and sold to entities that have an interest in their future behavior. As explained in the Guardian monitoring capitalism, "Google has discovered. Microsoft came late to this game, but now got into the water. Viewed this way, your agreement with Google is predictable and rational."
And here it is the sinister result of Microsoft's decision to stop needling Google with litigation becomes evident. "A key topic I am writing about capitalism is that monitoring flourished in the lawless area," says Zuboff. "Regulations and laws are their enemies. The democratic control is a threat. Anarchy is so vital to capitalism project tracking" he continues, "that the shared interest of Google and Microsoft on freedom of regulation are greater the narrow competing interests that they have or once thought they had. they can not insist that the public should be regulated by trying to impose regulations on the other. "
Standing in Power
What does this mean for cases pending against Google? For US antitrust experts and Maurice Stucke Grünes Allen, co-authors of a new comprehensive book that examines the depth and extent of the implications of monopolies and platform data warning of an unholy alliance between Zuboff technology giants as Microsoft and Google only accentuates the rigorous application, regulatory action intellectually driven. And when it comes to Google, if the action is in its clear vision."The only thing any regime antitrust absolutely must do if we want to be effective, it is to withstand the most powerful companies of the time," says Grunes. "The competition for disposal and is significant."
"The competition authorities in the US and the EU, in the case of Microsoft. 'Brains were taken, resources and continuous and tireless commitment."
However, only Europeans, he argues, seem to have the intellectual leadership to do so in the case of Google. "The failure of the FTC to take action against Google is certainly one of the great failures of all time."
Microsoft and Google new agreement to stop fighting against each other is an interesting move strategic company. But there is a movement accompanied a deeper much stronger game: to collect and take advantage of data - including data about us, our behaviors and interactions. The challenge for regulators and citizens is complex but essential - and has just started.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)